Wojtek Wybraniec
About the writer
Some quick facts about the writer. But honestly why, soon detailed information will come on http://alkoloid.no-ip.com/wojtek/ (yes, both in English and Swedish). But OK, just briefly for now.
I am an X violinist, by that time in the biggest contexts, I have a legal expert education at Law University in Gothenburg, now I am a writer and I own a company.
My motto is that everybody should be able to present opinions and Internet is a medium that should not in any part be censored. Even opinions that are uncomfortable or frankly said evil should be published. I my self have never used censure.
Another question that is important to me is the children’s right to their parents, or to clarify, not the parents right to children. I have debated that matter a lot because I have been active on Internet since 1998. I my self, have a wonderful, mellow and very intelligent daughter that I love indescribably.
I am in Thailand now and have a coming project to take care of that I probably can’t resist.
Send by kolumnen kl 2:38 AM
3 Comments
3 Comments:
Dear Mr WybraNiec,
You wrote the following:
"Another question that is important to me is the children’s right to their parents, or to clarify, not the parents right to children."
My Replies and comments:
What exactly Do you mean with your statement above?
I mean that the newborn child (0 - 1,5 years) should be with the nursing mother so the child can develop an immune system, whichs prevents from futurue diseases.
Is this a legal right, or is it a fundamental conviction or a moral thing ?
In another context, why Do you think that there is legal rights to such elementary phenomenon as "child rights to their parents"?
I would like to relate to a history with King Salomo( read it carefully ) and please, tell me your conclusions...
***
THe Harlots standing then before the presence of the King: With faltring speech and trembling tongue, one straite declares the thing:
Saying, my Lord we women had lately two children small, Which of all earthly joyes we did esteeme them most of all.
We had them much about one time, and both were of one sex, And one house doth containe us both, tis this that doth perplex My troubled soule th’one harlot said,
seeing her Childe is dead, She labours all she can to have mine, in her Infants stead.
For in the night she over-layd her childe, and it did dye: But waking straitway, she perceiv’d, and this sad sight did spie:
She straightway rose, and forthwith came at midnight to my bed: And tooke from me my living childe, and left with me hers dead.
But in the morning when I wak’d, not knowing what was done; By this vilde woman which doth seeke, to bereave me of my sonne: And taking gently in mine armes,
as then I thought, my childe: I straight perceiv’d it was not mine, and that I was beguil’d.
Nay, said the other Harlot then, the childe that lives is mine: And that same Infant that is dead, assuredly was thine:
That’s false reply’d the other straight, for that that lives (said she) Is none of thine, I did it beare, and it belongs to me.
Thus whatsoe’r the one did say, the other did deny: And what the other did affirme, did th’other presently, Cry’d out upon as false and vaine,
nor would they ere they said, Nor possibly could quietnesse betwixt them both be made.
Therefore they did implore the helpe, and wisedome of the King, Whose eye could onely pierce into so difficult a thing:
That he would graciously be pleas’d as he had heard it so: He would give sentence to their cause, which they would stand unto.
Salomon causd the living childe in the midst to be plac’d, Of both those Harlots that did seeke each other to disgrace:
And one of his servants he charg’d to fetch a sword straightway; Which to him presently was brought without the least delay.
Which sword he to his servant gave, putting it in his hand, Enjoyning him to execute what e’re he did command.
Divide the childe (saithe he) and give to each of them a part: Which words did pierce the true Mother unto the very heart.
Who humbly did beseech the King, rather then it should dye, To give it to the other all, that with her did stand by:
Nay answered the false Mother then, the King hath it decided: Neither thine, nor mine, the childe shall be, but let it be divided.
King Salomon weigh’d both their words, and looking on them both, Did say, that she the Mother is that most compassion shew’th:
Give her the childe that did lament, for such an Infant pretty, And when it should have mangled beene, was moved unto pitty.
That Mother gladly did receive her tender Babe againe: Which the false Mother cruelly desired might be slaine: And when the people heard the words,
and sentence of the King: Cry’d all with voice most lowd, God blesse Salomon in every thing.
*********
I also wonder how you define the following ?
Mr Wybaniec wrote:
"children’s right to their parents"
My replies and comments:
1. What is you definition of parents ?
Man and woman, Woman and woman, Man and man, Woman alone, Men alone
2. What about a "test tube child" ?
Which parent should this child have the right to? Also imagine that the child was abandon ?
3. A baby growing inside a surrogat mother ? Who is the parent ?
Best Regards,
Törstiga Torsten i Torslanda
Dear Mr Törstiga Borsten
About children’s right to their parents or parents right to children (or which was it now) I agree that I might have used my words a bit careless. What I mean is that parents should not make love with a monkey which is the quite common case where I stay now in Thailand. If you read today’s article you will understand.
Yours sincerely
Wojtek Wybraniec
Dear Mr Wybraniec,
"I agree that I might have used my words a bit careless"
Mr Thirsty Torsten replies:
I can't agree with your sentence above. I think that your earlier statement was made in a proper manner, including a good distinction between your point of view, and how certain Harlot Monkeys understands this very problematic question...
From an intellectual perspective we now can draw the final conclusion (according to the pictures) that monkeys are much alike "womankind". Further investigations on this matter has also shown us, that both creatures like bananas, not only in a litterally meaning...
Yours Faithfully,
Thirsty Torsten from Torslanda :)
Post a Comment
<< Home